Posts Tagged ‘buying property’

Credit rating impact of buying a property

September 23rd, 2009

Following the onset of the credit crunch banks took on a far more selective approach to help ensure that the risk rating of a potential borrower was acceptable to them.  This involved the bank conducting what is known as a “hard search” to ascertain the suitability of a property buyer. The problem is that the credit rating of the property buyer is adversely affected with every “hard search” carried out. As a comparison, a credit check carried out to assess the risk of a tenant is a “soft search” which does not impact this credit rating of the tenant (source: Credit-Check-Services.co.uk).

Of course none of this matters too much if you get an acceptable mortgage offer from the first bank you approach.  But for many people the first bank approached may provide poor terms, or worse still they may even decline your application, so you then approach another bank.  Each time a bank is approached with a request to lend another “hard search” is carried out, and with it another detrimental impact to the property buyer’s credit rating. Very soon the applicant’s credit rating starts to impact the bank’s perceived risk, thus the terms offered are even less favourable, and the risk of rejecting an application is greater.  The overall result is that it becomes increasingly difficult to get a mortgage with every new application made.

Such practices by banks are now being investigated by the Treasury Select Committee as MPs agree to launch a probe into this practice – and about time!  Clearly the banks are being unfair to consumers in restricting their opportunity to find the best mortgage by “damaging” a person’s credit rating every time they submit an application. It is expected that the Treasury Select committee will report back later in 2009, when we find out we will provide an update in our blog.

Buying a property with a tracker mortgage

August 31st, 2009

Historically buying a property with a tracker mortgage has been a good deal for those who can manage with their mortgage payments going up and down in line with the lender’s SVR or bank base rate. On average these tended to be a good deal for both the borrower and lender over a period of time. But it seems this is no longer to be the case.

 
The Sunday Times published an article (30/08/09) where they investigated the margins made on tracker rates in today’s market, what they found made for very interesting reading. On average lenders are charging £414 more per month on tracker mortgages than in January 2008, in effect the lenders have increased their margins over 3 month Libor which relates more closely to the cost of obtaining funds.

 
So today’s average tracker mortgage is now 3.07% higher than the Libor rate of 0.69%. Lenders are now making almost record profits with tracker mortgages. It also appears that many lenders are steering property buyers towards tracker mortgages by making the arrange fees / costs considerably higher for fixed rate mortgages.

 
Some analysts are now reporting that the higher costs of tracker mortgages could have a negative impact on economic recovery as it is effectively reducing the disposable incomes available to those with mortgages (the majority of the working population).

 
But perhaps there is an even bigger problem looming on the horizon. Some tracker deals have lock-ins, in effect if you redeem the mortgage in the next 1, 2, or 3 years you will have to pay penalty fees. With base rates predicted to increase (see our previous article here ) it means that tracker mortgages, and in particular bank base rate tracker mortgages, could become very expensive in the next 2 years. To put some figures on this, when bank base rates get back to 4% then the average tracker mortgage could go to 7% or more.